Log in

No account? Create an account
Previous Entry Share Next Entry

Mass legislature lobbying and rallies

Today, rsc and I went to the EqualMarriage rally at the statehouse. We actually got in unlike pinkfish because they had closed the doors when the chamber filled. There were about 500 people there overflowing the hall and staircases; various speeches, some singing, lots of applause and cheering and chanting Just Say NO.

Rev. Peter Gomes (Harvard - Memorial Church) was one of the more articulate speakers. He talked about how appalling it was that many black ministers were taking the Discrimination is OK position. I was most impressed by a Policeman from W Mass who is a GLBT policeman's organization leader - he said I'm out on the street defending people's civil rights - why can't I have my own for me and my partner now?

Afterwards we went to see two known-on-the-fence senators. The first was Steve Tolman (N Cambridge (not ours). There were a bunch of people there who we joined with. He essentially said he was waiting to see how the wind blows and exactly what the proposed amendment said before deciding what to do. We missed part of the meeting and he had to rush off to a meeting. He clearly showed that he worried about the consequences of his vote on reelection.

Then we went to see Bruce Tarr (Gloucester where we own a house but don't vote - we told him that). While waiting to see him in his outer office his staff said this was the busiest and most vocal issue they'd seen. He said he was still on the fence. But he talked with us at length, articulately. He clearly has been thinking and reading a lot about this topic - cited Loving v. Virginia among other things. He seems to think that Civil Unions would work especially in other states because of their DOMAs and might actually be more effective. We talked about all those federal benefits and the Full Faith and Credit clause in the constitution and how that might allow us to gain many protections and benefits. We talked about letting us get married would give us our rights in Massachusetts and was the best path towards this form of equality. I think there is a reasonable change he'll vote NO - but we'll see. (He is a Republican, a rarity in Mass - but won't hold that against him).

I'd talked to Tarr's and Tolman's aides last Thursday when I went to Lobby day. I also talked to Tim Toomey's (my rep) aide and Anne Paulsen's (not my rep but the one rep in Cambridge who I'd heard was on the fence. They both said their people were NO on any amendment.

I talked to Anthony Verga (rep Gloucester) who was against marriage for us but for civil unions. We talked quite a while - he said it was a matter of his personal belief that was inconsistent with letting us be married. He said he was appalled by the actions of the Catholic church on this issue.

I sent letters to all five people and reported back to the EqualMarriage people about what I had learned.

  • 1
he said it was a matter of his personal belief that was inconsistent with letting us be married.

So his one opinion wipes out the votes of his constituents? Is he that ignorant and hard headed? Maybe we should amend the US Constitution to make ignorance and fear illegal.

I wish I had heard Rev Gomes. Did someone record his words (or write them down)?

I don't think he is ignorant. His web site only lists a High School education. He is a fishing industry proponent and has some form of job to support it - and I think comes from a fishing family (as do many Gloucester people). He said he was getting more calls and letters against same-sex marriage but that wasn't his reason at all. He said it really was his personal view based upon his upbringing; it sounded to me that he almost wished he could vote the other way but he couldn't. I think this is a case of gut-feeling based upon his upbringing (especially in the Catholic church) over reason. I almost got the feeling that he would be content if no amendment passed but he couldn't help us achieve that. If we had a few months maybe he could be convinced to vote the other way. I did like his sincerity and directness.

watching from afar and hoping. this issue really lets you know who gets it and who doesn't--i am so depressed over the (democratic, mind you) governor of illinois' position i could weep.

  • 1